<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetPointers Removes Numerous Duplicate SEO Spam Pages</title>
	<link>http://www.seobomb.com/netpointers-removes-numerous-duplicate-seo-spam-pages/</link>
	<description>Viral Marketing &#038; Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: eniac</title>
		<link>http://www.seobomb.com/netpointers-removes-numerous-duplicate-seo-spam-pages/#comment-23026</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seobomb.com/netpointers-removes-numerous-duplicate-seo-spam-pages/#comment-23026</guid>
					<description>NetPointers worked with New Zealand's largest company, Fonterra (www.fonterra.com). Fonterra had a client meeting with Reps from Google Australia in 2003 at which time Google advised Fonterra to remove the offending script and lead-in pages from their website and to end the relationship with NetPointers or they would be black listed by Google.

Fonterra prompt took legal advice as to their position with NetPointers and subsequently ended the relationship and accordingly removed all offending code and pages created by NetPointers for Fonterra.

For sure their practices have been dodgy in this case and would suspect they would use similar techniques with other clients websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NetPointers worked with New Zealand&#8217;s largest company, Fonterra (www.fonterra.com). Fonterra had a client meeting with Reps from Google Australia in 2003 at which time Google advised Fonterra to remove the offending script and lead-in pages from their website and to end the relationship with NetPointers or they would be black listed by Google.</p>
<p>Fonterra prompt took legal advice as to their position with NetPointers and subsequently ended the relationship and accordingly removed all offending code and pages created by NetPointers for Fonterra.</p>
<p>For sure their practices have been dodgy in this case and would suspect they would use similar techniques with other clients websites.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
