<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Bomb Blog Gets Page Rank Assigned - Yay!</title>
	<link>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/</link>
	<description>Viral Marketing &#038; Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DuppRisehicsexilk</title>
		<link>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/#comment-140523</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/#comment-140523</guid>
					<description>elzxnrdjqermxciywell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how's life? hope it's introduce branch ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elzxnrdjqermxciywell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how&#8217;s life? hope it&#8217;s introduce branch <img src='http://www.seobomb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/#comment-2855</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/#comment-2855</guid>
					<description>Google does not publish all of the back links it knows of.  While Google's Matt Cutts has stated that Google is up front about this, I have never found documentation on this &quot;broken&quot; feature.  It would be better if they removed the tool as it is too misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google does not publish all of the back links it knows of.  While Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts has stated that Google is up front about this, I have never found documentation on this &#8220;broken&#8221; feature.  It would be better if they removed the tool as it is too misleading.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: oddcomments</title>
		<link>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/#comment-245</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seobomb.com/seo-bomb-gets-page-rank-assigned-yay/#comment-245</guid>
					<description>Do a search for the pages that you know link to your site and see if they are indexed.  My guess is they are.  What I have noticed over the past few months is that Google seems to be withholding that data.  I am not sure why.

For example, check the backlinks for Adventures by Disney (http://abd.disney.go.com/).  There are several links from a Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_by_Disney), which shows up when you do a search for Adventures by Disney, but does not show in the backlinks.  To me this appears to be a clear case of Google intentionally withholding backlink information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a search for the pages that you know link to your site and see if they are indexed.  My guess is they are.  What I have noticed over the past few months is that Google seems to be withholding that data.  I am not sure why.</p>
<p>For example, check the backlinks for Adventures by Disney (http://abd.disney.go.com/).  There are several links from a Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_by_Disney), which shows up when you do a search for Adventures by Disney, but does not show in the backlinks.  To me this appears to be a clear case of Google intentionally withholding backlink information.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
